We can’t really whine about transparency when they don’t give us full details, and also complain that it’s too complex when they do.ġ. ISO to “圆4 (NOT FOR UPGRADE OR REINSTALL)”Ĭome on M$ lets have some transparency here, you dropped the ball now just be straight and honest with us and given time some may “forgive and forget” one things for sure, you haven’t convinced me to try an upgrade in place from my normal clean install policy, not sure your ever going to either after this little stunt. update that makes no mention of a fix in any of the blurb that went with succinctly put it there’s the 3 versions floating around and I can find nothing about it in all the M$ pages on the issue except, just don’t use the original and wait for the new one, cool which new one are we getting?Īs for me I have just have the original saved 11763.1 and I just changed the label on the. OK so its back again and with the perils glossed over by some how trivialising the numbers affected, begs the question how many suffered in silence and shrugged their shoulders and wrote off the missing data as just another thing? any way I digress so for the uninitiated off to the Download page what version are you going to get?ġ1763.1 (They wouldn’t dare would they?)ġ1763.17 (surely not its a slow ring release not RTM?)ġ1763.55 (complete with todays Cumm. The hilarity, if it wasn’t so miserable for the affected users, continues in true M$ fashion. I don’t know how to find out what the current Known Folder Redirection settings are, and I’m not sure I could find all of my user documents subdirectories. It’s a good thing I have my metered connections so 1809 will pass me by, because I am likely to have a few files tucked away where Microsoft doesn’t want them to be. The concept of the upgrade process itself handling my user documents and determining appropriate locations to store my files is foreign to me. It was me putting my files where I knew I could find them, and where idiots like myself wouldn’t accidently delete them. It wasn’t me who was “misplacing” user files in places where the O.S. I usually copied the various users’ directories from the older computer to the newer computer every time a new machine arrived in the household, resulting in a confusing tree of subdirectories with names like “Joe from Compaq” or “Jan from Gateway2K” filled with the old default user folders. Sometimes it was “my downloads,” other times it was “downloads.” Default file locations changed from place to place between Win95, and WinME, to WinXP. More recently, I remember default folder names changing from Windows version to version, and even when new service packs installed. MS-DOS 1.01, for example, did not save documents to default subdirectories (Hint for the younger ones: there were no subdirectories back then.) Files stayed where you chose to save them. Some users are not too young to remember the days when users controlled their own hardware and software. There is no law that says users must keep their document files in the default locations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |